(by N. B. Kay – Updated 12th July 2021)
Pushing the experimental ‘vaccine’ – the right response?
I was baffled to see governments around the globe pushing for ‘vaccination roll-out’ as the main answer to the SarsCov-19 Virus. Although the theory of vaccination as a tool in lessening the severity of symptoms may work, it does not stop infection and transmission. The push to ‘vaccinate all’ seems to present a rather disturbing agenda rather than to keep people well and healthy.
With that in mind, it makes one wonder why there is a push on injecting everyone with ‘new technologies’ that to my understanding are not vaccines, are still on clinical trials and have more unknown risks than potential benefits. No one should be forced, coerced or manipulated and yet that is exactly what the government and health authorities are doing with the Behaviour Change Unit Document in optimising vaccination roll-out. I believe, every person should have the freedom of choice as to whether they take these new injections but is it negligent that it is even being rolled-out and given while still on clinical trials?
Sars-Cov-19 Spike Proteins from the Virus and Spike Proteins from the Sars-Cov19 Injections
The prestigious Salk Institute, founded by vaccine pioneer Jonas Salk, has authored and published a scientific article revealing that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is what’s actually causing vascular damage in covid-19 patients. But exactly how it did so was not understood. Similarly, scientists studying other coronaviruses have long suspected that the spike protein contributed to damaging vascular endothelial cells, but this is the first time the process has been documented.
In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudo-virus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudo-virus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.
The team then replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells (which line arteries) to the spike protein. They showed that the spike protein damaged the cells by binding ACE2. This binding disrupted ACE2’s molecular signalling to mitochondria (organelles that generate energy for cells), causing the mitochondria to become damaged and fragmented.
Previous studies have shown a similar effect when cells were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but this is the first study to show that the damage occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own.
“If you remove the replicating capabilities of the virus, it still has a major damaging effect on the vascular cells, simply by virtue of its ability to bind to this ACE2 receptor, the S protein receptor.
Adverse Drug Reactions
The Sars-Covid-19 injections currently in widespread use, either inject patients with the spike protein or, via Adenoviral Vector and mRNA technology, instruct the patient’s own body to manufacture spike proteins and release them into their own blood. This floods the patient’s body with the spike protein that may be the cause of vascular damage and related events such as blood clots.
Immune Response Theory
If we try and understand the theory of how the body works after these new injections, let us try and unpack it. After these spike proteins are produced or introduced into the cells, it will infect the cells, and will trigger the adaptive immune cells, the T lymphocytes in particular. These T lymphocytes then kills and destroys the infected cells. B Lymphocytes are then triggered to produce antibodies against the spike proteins. The next time the body is exposed to these spike proteins, the body will quickly recognise these spike proteins and produce antibodies. Remember that the body is not immune to the Covid 19 virus. It has just been introduced to the spike proteins that is part of the Covid 19 virus.
As a Christian, I believe God is my ultimate Protector and the One who preserves life but I also think there are prevention methods or ways for vulnerable people as well as the general healthy people in fighting the SarsCov-19 Virus. I was taught in nursing that the approach to health is, prevention and my concern with these new injections being introduced inside the cells to produce antibodies for one specific Covid virus, seem to be genetically invasive in nature. Our cells are created as the basic part for different organs in our bodies, bringing the whole body into one and the risks of damage on a cellular to systemic level outweigh the benefit of producing 1 specific antibodies.
Other scientists and medical practitioners have recommended other ways like: boosting the immune system with Vitamin A, B, C with Zinc, D, E; eating more fruit, vegetables and food that are high in these vitamins; exercise; having enough sleep; looking after our mental health; and in general having a healthy lifestyle. Recommendation of the use of Ivermectin from Christians, Doctor Sherri Tenpenny and Doctor Carrie Madej. What about Budesonide, Hydroxychloroquine and maybe other drugs that are available as re-purposed drugs for treatment? Somehow, these recommendations have been overpowered by the roll-out of these new technologies. But to what purpose? We should ask ourselves if these injections are for the greater good of all humanity, as they say, or even for the sake of health? Or is it a way in which they want to control and bring people into submission and bring about their agenda?
With all that, questions remain, as all these Sars-Cov-19 Injections are on clinical trials:
- If we are all created differently and one size doesn’t fit all, what will these injections do to the different cells in the body on an individual basis?
- Can someone’s genetic make-up change or a person’s genes be modified?
- And how do we address the 71 people in the UK who have died from a blood clotting related disorder?
- Indeed, is it just 71 people out of the millions who have received the injection?
- What does God think?
- If He cares and weeps for one person, will He not weep and grieve for those lives?
- What about those who died after the injections? There are 450 UK death reports of suspected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) to Pfizer-BionTech, 960 death reports from Oxford-AstraZeneca, 6 from Moderna and 24 where the brand of injection was unspecified? [See Government report] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
- Are there more unreported deaths and other fatal adverse drug reactions(ADRs)?
- Can it be proven that these deaths have no causal link to the SarsCov-19 injections?
- Can we really say ‘the benefits outweigh the risks’?
And so, aside from the reason that all these ‘SarsCov-19 Injections’ are still on Clinical Trials with no long-term safety data, my decision in not taking it, is because I believe my Body Cells containing all my genetic make-up, DNA, RNA and Proteins, bringing every function in my body to life is LIFE ITSELF. LIFE that is created and given by God alone. I believe LIFE should not be experimented on or meddled with as lightly as it is being done, with these new technologies.
Romans 12:1-2 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.